ICAF Store | What We Do | KidZone | Resources | About ICAF | Get Involved
Quicklinks | Japanese
Forums March2000
                     
 
 
 

 

Washington Forum on the Future of Our Children
March 28, 2000 12:00 noon – 1:30 p.m.

Forum Attendees
Linda C. Byron, The Arts Society of the International Monetary Fund; L. William Chapin, The American Architectural Foundation; Caroline Croft, White House Millennium Council; Kae Dakin, Washington Regional Association of Grantmakers; Rod Daniel, International Network of Performing and Visual Arts School; Sharon Flynn, Center for Media Education; Danielle Friedenberg, National Center on Education and the Economy; Adam Goozh, Createhope.org; Mary Liniger Hickman, D.C. Commission on the Arts and Humanities; Heidi Hinish, National Gallery of Art; Robert Lynch, Americans for the Arts: Dorothy McSweeny, DC Commission on the Arts and Humanities; Patricia Mitchell, Fillmore Arts Center; Peter N.G. Schwartz, ValuesFirst Inc.; Ranya Sihweil, ArtsEdge - John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts; Avideh Shashaani, Fund for the Future of Children. (Mrs. Harriet Fulbright was unable to attend and chair the meeting). ICAF staff members attending were Tim Bigelow, Cecily Ferguson, Sharon Franklin, Ashfaq Ishaq, and Melina Manasse.

Children and the Digital Revolution
Sharon Flynn began the discussion with an observation that the Internet provides an excellent opportunity to provide information and further the interest of young people in becoming better citizens and furthering the future of our democracy. The Internet may curb the current wave of apathy that exists in young people and open them to ideas on civics and responsibility. Adam Goozh added that his organization is launching a Website for children to learn about philanthropy and become familiar at an early age with the idea of giving to causes they support. Patricia Mitchell responded that technology is a powerful tool that provides exposure to technical solutions and that her school includes digital art in its programs. Rayna Sihweil cautioned that only 2.2 % of the world are online, and that we should not abandon the more traditional forms of outreach efforts. It was generally agreed that the Internet should provide diverse, educational Websites, not just a few mega commercial sites. It was agreed that children should not be viewed merely as consumers in the “new economy” but mechanisms should exist for them to make their own contributions as well. It was observed that adding a “digital” component to any proposal opens up new funding sources. The role of the information overload in the case of children was discussed, as was the need to develop “filters” for children to process information.

Children’s Creativity
Dr. Ishaq asked the question: What comes after the Digital Revolution, a Creativity Revolution? Danielle Fridenberg commented that we cannot forget the importance of the hand and eye connection. Bill Chapin added that the ability to think through the design is essential in bridging the technology gap between the digital and the hand. Because creativity is an intangible, Bob Lynch observed that it was necessary to shape the policy and advocacy for philanthropy. Kae Dakin asked whether there existed hard data on art and creativity. She stated that funders are interested in results, the behavior changes expected and how success of each program is measured. Bob Lynch added that Americans for the Arts offers hard data and research results on the subject and informed the attendees to make use of the studies available through the “National Arts Policy Clearing House” and the publication, “Champions of Change.” Dorothy McSweeny stated that economic impact studies would be available for DC very soon. It was observed that programs should include parents because their involvement is critical, and therefore, parents need to understand the value of arts education.

Educational Reform
The discussion started on the issue that educational reform often leaves art out of the equation. It was observed that blending arts education with standards-based education could offer a win-win situation. Developing motor skills and manual dexterity was considered vital to the brain’s development. It was commented that however useful they are, computers cannot “do it all.”

Voices of the Children
It was agreed that children’s input is vital at every stage. It was remarked that children should be considered to sit on advisory boards of organizations that deal with children. The value of art education networks such as Arts Education Partnership and Cultural Advocacy Group was emphasized.

Resolution
Attendees concurred that the Forum had been beneficial for them because it brought together diverse organizations that deal with children issues but do not know each other’s programs. It was considered important that each organization know what others were planning. The Forum offered the opportunity to attendees to work collectively through partnerships. Caroline Croft suggested that the Forum convene bi-monthly.

The next meeting of the Washington Forum will take place on Tuesday, July 18th from 12:00 noon to 2:00 pm at the headquarters of the International Child Art Foundation (ICAF). Ms. Harriet Mayor Fulbright, Executive Director, President’s Committee on the Arts and the Humanities, will chair the meeting. For further information, please contact Ms. Sharon R. Franklin at ICAF at (202) 973-8490 or by e-mail: srfranklin@icaf.org